Slicing the Pie: Quantifying the Aggregate and Distributional Effects of Trade /
Galle, Simon.
Slicing the Pie: Quantifying the Aggregate and Distributional Effects of Trade / Simon Galle, Andrés Rodríguez-Clare, Moises Yi. - Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 2017. - 1 online resource: illustrations (black and white); - NBER working paper series no. w23737 . - Working Paper Series (National Bureau of Economic Research) no. w23737. .
August 2017.
We develop a multi-sector gravity model with heterogeneous workers to quantify the aggregate and group-level welfare effects of trade. We estimate the model using the structural relationship between China-shock driven changes in manufacturing employment and average earnings across US groups defined by commuting zone and education. We find that the China shock increases average welfare but some groups experience losses as high as five times the average gain. Adjusted for plausible measures of inequality aversion, gains in social welfare are positive and only slightly lower than with the standard aggregation.
System requirements: Adobe [Acrobat] Reader required for PDF files.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.
Slicing the Pie: Quantifying the Aggregate and Distributional Effects of Trade / Simon Galle, Andrés Rodríguez-Clare, Moises Yi. - Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 2017. - 1 online resource: illustrations (black and white); - NBER working paper series no. w23737 . - Working Paper Series (National Bureau of Economic Research) no. w23737. .
August 2017.
We develop a multi-sector gravity model with heterogeneous workers to quantify the aggregate and group-level welfare effects of trade. We estimate the model using the structural relationship between China-shock driven changes in manufacturing employment and average earnings across US groups defined by commuting zone and education. We find that the China shock increases average welfare but some groups experience losses as high as five times the average gain. Adjusted for plausible measures of inequality aversion, gains in social welfare are positive and only slightly lower than with the standard aggregation.
System requirements: Adobe [Acrobat] Reader required for PDF files.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.