The Degree of Judicial Enforcement and Credit Markets: Evidence from Japanese Household Panel Data /
Horioka, Charles Yuji.
The Degree of Judicial Enforcement and Credit Markets: Evidence from Japanese Household Panel Data / Charles Yuji Horioka, Shizuka Sekita. - Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 2010. - 1 online resource: illustrations (black and white); - NBER working paper series no. w15631 . - Working Paper Series (National Bureau of Economic Research) no. w15631. .
January 2010.
In this paper, we conduct an empirical analysis of the impact of better judicial enforcement on the probability of being credit rationed, loan size, and the probability of bankruptcy using household-level data from the Japanese Panel Survey of Consumers, conducted by the Institute for Research on Household Economics, in conjunction with judicial data by court district on trial length and the ratio of the number of pending civil trials to the number of incoming civil trials. Contrary to the predictions of the existing theory, we find that better judicial enforcement increases the probability of being credit rationed and decreases loan size. Furthermore, we find that better judicial enforcement increases the probability of bankruptcy, a result that is consistent with lax screening effects.
System requirements: Adobe [Acrobat] Reader required for PDF files.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.
The Degree of Judicial Enforcement and Credit Markets: Evidence from Japanese Household Panel Data / Charles Yuji Horioka, Shizuka Sekita. - Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 2010. - 1 online resource: illustrations (black and white); - NBER working paper series no. w15631 . - Working Paper Series (National Bureau of Economic Research) no. w15631. .
January 2010.
In this paper, we conduct an empirical analysis of the impact of better judicial enforcement on the probability of being credit rationed, loan size, and the probability of bankruptcy using household-level data from the Japanese Panel Survey of Consumers, conducted by the Institute for Research on Household Economics, in conjunction with judicial data by court district on trial length and the ratio of the number of pending civil trials to the number of incoming civil trials. Contrary to the predictions of the existing theory, we find that better judicial enforcement increases the probability of being credit rationed and decreases loan size. Furthermore, we find that better judicial enforcement increases the probability of bankruptcy, a result that is consistent with lax screening effects.
System requirements: Adobe [Acrobat] Reader required for PDF files.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.