Consumption Commitments and Habit Formation /
Chetty, Raj.
Consumption Commitments and Habit Formation / Raj Chetty, Adam Szeidl. - Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 2004. - 1 online resource: illustrations (black and white); - NBER working paper series no. w10970 . - Working Paper Series (National Bureau of Economic Research) no. w10970. .
December 2004.
We analyze the implications of household-level adjustment costs for the dynamics of aggregate consumption. We show that an economy in which agents have "consumption commitments" is approximately equivalent to a habit formation model in which the habit stock is a weighted average of past consumption if idiosyncratic risk is large relative to aggregate risk. Consumption commitments can thus explain the empirical regularity that consumption is excessively sensitive and excessively smooth, findings that are typically attributed to habit formation. Unlike habit formation and other theories, but consistent with empirical evidence, the consumption commitments model also predicts that excess sensitivity and smoothness vanish for large shocks. These results suggest that behavior previously attributed to habit formation may be better explained by adjustment costs. We develop additional testable predictions to further distinguish the commitment and habit models and show that the two models have different welfare implications.
System requirements: Adobe [Acrobat] Reader required for PDF files.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.
Consumption Commitments and Habit Formation / Raj Chetty, Adam Szeidl. - Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 2004. - 1 online resource: illustrations (black and white); - NBER working paper series no. w10970 . - Working Paper Series (National Bureau of Economic Research) no. w10970. .
December 2004.
We analyze the implications of household-level adjustment costs for the dynamics of aggregate consumption. We show that an economy in which agents have "consumption commitments" is approximately equivalent to a habit formation model in which the habit stock is a weighted average of past consumption if idiosyncratic risk is large relative to aggregate risk. Consumption commitments can thus explain the empirical regularity that consumption is excessively sensitive and excessively smooth, findings that are typically attributed to habit formation. Unlike habit formation and other theories, but consistent with empirical evidence, the consumption commitments model also predicts that excess sensitivity and smoothness vanish for large shocks. These results suggest that behavior previously attributed to habit formation may be better explained by adjustment costs. We develop additional testable predictions to further distinguish the commitment and habit models and show that the two models have different welfare implications.
System requirements: Adobe [Acrobat] Reader required for PDF files.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.