CEO Pay and Firm Performance: Dynamics, Asymmetries, and Alternative Performance Measures /
Joskow, Paul L.
CEO Pay and Firm Performance: Dynamics, Asymmetries, and Alternative Performance Measures / Paul L. Joskow, Nancy L. Rose. - Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 1994. - 1 online resource: illustrations (black and white); - NBER working paper series no. w4976 . - Working Paper Series (National Bureau of Economic Research) no. w4976. .
December 1994.
This study explores the dynamic structure of the pay-for- performance relationship in CEO compensation and quantifies the effect of introducing a more complex model of firm financial performance on the estimated performance sensitivity of executive pay. The results suggest that current compensation responds to past performance outcomes, but that the effect decays considerably within two years. This contrasts sharply with models of infinitely persistent performance effects implicitly assumed in much of the empirical compensation literature. We find that both accounting and market performance measures influence compensation and that the salary and bonus component of pay as well as total compensation have become more sensitive to firm financial performance over the past two decades. There is no evidence that boards fail to penalize CEOs for poor financial performance or reward them disproportionately well for good performance. Finally, the data suggest that boards may discount extreme performance outcomes -both high and low - relative to performance that lies within some `normal' band in setting compensation.
System requirements: Adobe [Acrobat] Reader required for PDF files.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.
CEO Pay and Firm Performance: Dynamics, Asymmetries, and Alternative Performance Measures / Paul L. Joskow, Nancy L. Rose. - Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 1994. - 1 online resource: illustrations (black and white); - NBER working paper series no. w4976 . - Working Paper Series (National Bureau of Economic Research) no. w4976. .
December 1994.
This study explores the dynamic structure of the pay-for- performance relationship in CEO compensation and quantifies the effect of introducing a more complex model of firm financial performance on the estimated performance sensitivity of executive pay. The results suggest that current compensation responds to past performance outcomes, but that the effect decays considerably within two years. This contrasts sharply with models of infinitely persistent performance effects implicitly assumed in much of the empirical compensation literature. We find that both accounting and market performance measures influence compensation and that the salary and bonus component of pay as well as total compensation have become more sensitive to firm financial performance over the past two decades. There is no evidence that boards fail to penalize CEOs for poor financial performance or reward them disproportionately well for good performance. Finally, the data suggest that boards may discount extreme performance outcomes -both high and low - relative to performance that lies within some `normal' band in setting compensation.
System requirements: Adobe [Acrobat] Reader required for PDF files.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.