Contractual Rigidity and Political Contestability: Revisiting Public Contract Renegotiations / Jean Beuve, Marian W. Moszoro, Pablo T. Spiller.
Material type:![Text](/opac-tmpl/lib/famfamfam/BK.png)
- D23 - Organizational Behavior • Transaction Costs • Property Rights
- D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
- D73 - Bureaucracy • Administrative Processes in Public Organizations • Corruption
- D78 - Positive Analysis of Policy Formulation and Implementation
- H57 - Procurement
- Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers
Item type | Home library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Working Paper | Biblioteca Digital | Colección NBER | nber w28491 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not For Loan |
February 2021.
We present a model of public procurement in which both contractual flexibility and political tolerance for contractual deviations determine renegotiations. In the model, contractual flexibility allows for adaptation without formal renegotiation while political tolerance for deviations decreases with political competition. We then compare renegotiation rates of procurement contracts in which the procurer is either a public administration or a private corporation. We find robust evidence consistent with the model predictions: public-to-private contracts are renegotiated more often than comparable private-to-private contracts, and that this pattern is more salient in politically contestable jurisdictions. The frequent renegotiation of public contracts results from their inherent rigidity and provides a relational quality of adaptability to contingencies in politically contestable environments.
Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers
System requirements: Adobe [Acrobat] Reader required for PDF files.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.
Print version record
There are no comments on this title.