Polluting Public Funds: The Effect of Environmental Regulation on Municipal Bonds. / Akshaya Jha, Stephen A. Karolyi, Nicholas Z. Muller.
Material type:![Text](/opac-tmpl/lib/famfamfam/BK.png)
- G12 - Asset Pricing • Trading Volume • Bond Interest Rates
- G14 - Information and Market Efficiency • Event Studies • Insider Trading
- Q52 - Pollution Control Adoption and Costs • Distributional Effects • Employment Effects
- Q53 - Air Pollution • Water Pollution • Noise • Hazardous Waste • Solid Waste • Recycling
- Q58 - Government Policy
- R51 - Finance in Urban and Rural Economies
- Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers
Item type | Home library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Working Paper | Biblioteca Digital | Colección NBER | nber w28210 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not For Loan |
December 2020.
We present three findings on the effects of environmental regulation on the municipal bond market. First, yields increase (decrease) after a new standard is proposed (finalized), consistent with the resolution of regulatory uncertainty. Second, around annual compliance announcements, yields fall for counties that remain in compliance but increase for newly noncompliant counties. Third, yields are substantially higher for bonds from counties just above the pollution threshold relative to counties just below the threshold. Our findings suggest that increases in regulatory stringency or uncertainty over future environmental policy increase the cost of municipal debt raised to fund critical infrastructure.
Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers
System requirements: Adobe [Acrobat] Reader required for PDF files.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.
Print version record
There are no comments on this title.