Image from Google Jackets

Medical Research and Health Care Finance: Evidence from Academic Medical Centers / Pierre Azoulay, Misty L. Heggeness, Jennifer L. Kao.

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextSeries: Working Paper Series (National Bureau of Economic Research) ; no. w27943.Publication details: Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 2020.Description: 1 online resource: illustrations (black and white)Subject(s): Online resources: Available additional physical forms:
  • Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers
Abstract: Academic Medical Centers (AMCs)--comprising medical schools, teaching hospitals, and research laboratories)--play an important role in US biomedical innovation. The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (BBA) changed the formula used to reimburse Medicare inpatient claims and subsidies for medical residents. We study the effect of changes in the generosity of clinical care reimbursements on the rate and direction of research performed within these institutions. We compare AMCs' relative exposure to the reform and how these differences affect their researchers' ability to attract NIH grant funding, as well as the quantity, impact, and content of their publications. We find that in response to the BBA, research activity increased by 10% among the average teaching hospital and 20% among major teaching hospitals, with larger effects observed for "translational" and clinical research. We find little evidence of concurrent changes in clinical outcomes.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

October 2020.

Academic Medical Centers (AMCs)--comprising medical schools, teaching hospitals, and research laboratories)--play an important role in US biomedical innovation. The Balanced Budget Act of 1997 (BBA) changed the formula used to reimburse Medicare inpatient claims and subsidies for medical residents. We study the effect of changes in the generosity of clinical care reimbursements on the rate and direction of research performed within these institutions. We compare AMCs' relative exposure to the reform and how these differences affect their researchers' ability to attract NIH grant funding, as well as the quantity, impact, and content of their publications. We find that in response to the BBA, research activity increased by 10% among the average teaching hospital and 20% among major teaching hospitals, with larger effects observed for "translational" and clinical research. We find little evidence of concurrent changes in clinical outcomes.

Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers

System requirements: Adobe [Acrobat] Reader required for PDF files.

Mode of access: World Wide Web.

Print version record

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Powered by Koha