The Macroeconomic Effects of Macroprudential Policy: Evidence from a Narrative Approach / Diego Rojas, Carlos A. Vegh, Guillermo Vuletin.

By:

Rojas, Diego

Contributor(s):

Material type: Text

TextSeries: Working Paper Series (National Bureau of Economic Research) ; no. w27687.Publication details: Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 2020.Description: 1 online resource: illustrations (black and white)Subject(s):

Online resources:

Available additional physical forms:

Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers

Abstract: We analyze the macroeconomic effects of macroprudential policy - in the form of legal reserve requirements - in three Latin American countries (Argentina, Brazil, and Uruguay). To correctly identify innovations in changes in legal reserve requirements, we develop a narrative approach - based on contemporaneous reports from the IMF and Central Banks in the spirit of Romer and Romer (2010) - that classifies each change into endogenous or exogenous to the business cycle. We show that this distinction is critical in understanding the macroeconomic effects of reserve requirements. In particular, we show that output falls in response to exogenous increases in legal reserve requirements but would seem not to be affected (or could even increase!) when using all changes and relying on traditional time-identifying strategies. This bias reflects the practical relevance of the misidentification of endogenous countercyclical changes in reserve requirements. We also push the empirical frontier along two important dimensions. First, in measuring legal reserve requirements, we take into account both the different types of legal reserve requirements in terms of maturity and currency of denomination as well as the structure of deposits. Second, since in practice reserve requirement policy is tightly linked to monetary policy, we also jointly analyze the macroeconomic effects of changes in central bank interest rates. To properly identify exogenous central bank interest rate shocks, we follow Romer and Romer (2004).

Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.

Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Holdings
Item type	Home library	Collection	Call number	Status	Date due	Barcode	Item holds
Working Paper	Biblioteca Digital	Colección NBER	nber w27687 (Browse shelf(Opens below))	Not For Loan

Total holds: 0

Collection: Colección NBER Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)

Previous	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	No cover image available	Next
Previous	nber w27684 Generalizable and Robust TV Advertising Effects /	nber w27685 Behavioral Welfare Economics and Risk Preferences: A Bayesian Approach /	nber w27686 Patenting Inventions or Inventing Patents? Strategic Use of Continuations at the USPTO /	nber w27687 The Macroeconomic Effects of Macroprudential Policy: Evidence from a Narrative Approach /	nber w27688 What Determines School Segregation? The Crucial Role of Neighborhood Factors /	nber w27689 Discrimination and Racial Disparities in Labor Market Outcomes: Evidence from WWII /	nber w2769 Intellectual Property Rights and North-South Trade /	Next

August 2020.

We analyze the macroeconomic effects of macroprudential policy - in the form of legal reserve requirements - in three Latin American countries (Argentina, Brazil, and Uruguay). To correctly identify innovations in changes in legal reserve requirements, we develop a narrative approach - based on contemporaneous reports from the IMF and Central Banks in the spirit of Romer and Romer (2010) - that classifies each change into endogenous or exogenous to the business cycle. We show that this distinction is critical in understanding the macroeconomic effects of reserve requirements. In particular, we show that output falls in response to exogenous increases in legal reserve requirements but would seem not to be affected (or could even increase!) when using all changes and relying on traditional time-identifying strategies. This bias reflects the practical relevance of the misidentification of endogenous countercyclical changes in reserve requirements. We also push the empirical frontier along two important dimensions. First, in measuring legal reserve requirements, we take into account both the different types of legal reserve requirements in terms of maturity and currency of denomination as well as the structure of deposits. Second, since in practice reserve requirement policy is tightly linked to monetary policy, we also jointly analyze the macroeconomic effects of changes in central bank interest rates. To properly identify exogenous central bank interest rate shocks, we follow Romer and Romer (2004).