Can Pigou at the Polls Stop Us Melting the Poles? / Soren T. Anderson, Ioana Marinescu, Boris Shor.
Material type:![Text](/opac-tmpl/lib/famfamfam/BK.png)
- D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
- H23 - Externalities • Redistributive Effects • Environmental Taxes and Subsidies
- H71 - State and Local Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue
- H72 - State and Local Budget and Expenditures
- Q52 - Pollution Control Adoption and Costs • Distributional Effects • Employment Effects
- Q54 - Climate • Natural Disasters and Their Management • Global Warming
- Q58 - Government Policy
- Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers
Item type | Home library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Working Paper | Biblioteca Digital | Colección NBER | nber w26146 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not For Loan |
August 2019.
Surveys show majority U.S. support for a carbon tax. Yet none has been adopted. Why? We study two failed carbon tax initiatives in Washington State in 2016 and 2018. Using a difference-in-differences approach, we show that Washington's real-world campaigns reduced support by 20 percentage points. Resistance to higher energy prices explains opposition to these policies in the average precinct, while ideology explains 90% of the variation in votes across precincts. Conservatives preferred the 2016 revenue-neutral policy, while liberals preferred the 2018 green-spending policy. Yet we forecast both initiatives would fail in other states, demonstrating that surveys are overly optimistic.
Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers
System requirements: Adobe [Acrobat] Reader required for PDF files.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.
Print version record
There are no comments on this title.