Going the Extra Mile: Distant Lending and Credit Cycles / João Granja, Christian Leuz, Raghuram Rajan.
Material type:data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/752e6/752e6942bd3b7b7c72280cd405e4d458d14c8e82" alt="Text"
- E32 - Business Fluctuations • Cycles
- E44 - Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy
- G01 - Financial Crises
- G18 - Government Policy and Regulation
- G21 - Banks • Depository Institutions • Micro Finance Institutions • Mortgages
- G32 - Financing Policy • Financial Risk and Risk Management • Capital and Ownership Structure • Value of Firms • Goodwill
- L14 - Transactional Relationships • Contracts and Reputation • Networks
- Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers
Item type | Home library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Working Paper | Biblioteca Digital | Colección NBER | nber w25196 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not For Loan |
October 2018.
The average distance of U.S. banks from their small corporate borrowers increased before the global financial crisis, especially for banks in competitive counties. Small distant loans are harder to make, so loan quality deteriorated. Surprisingly, such lending intensified as the Fed raised interest rates from 2004. Why? We show banks' responses to higher rates led to bank deposits shifting into competitive counties. Short-horizon bank management recycled these inflows into risky loans to distant uncompetitive counties. Thus, rate hikes, competition, and managerial short-termism explain why inflows 'burned a hole' in banks' pockets and, more generally, increased risky lending.
Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers
System requirements: Adobe [Acrobat] Reader required for PDF files.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.
Print version record
There are no comments on this title.