How European Markets Became Free: A Study of Institutional Drift / Germán Gutiérrez, Thomas Philippon.
Material type:data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/752e6/752e6942bd3b7b7c72280cd405e4d458d14c8e82" alt="Text"
- D02 - Institutions: Design, Formation, Operations, and Impact
- D41 - Perfect Competition
- D42 - Monopoly
- D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection
- D72 - Political Processes: Rent-Seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
- E25 - Aggregate Factor Income Distribution
- K21 - Antitrust Law
- L0 - General
- Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers
Item type | Home library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Working Paper | Biblioteca Digital | Colección NBER | nber w24700 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not For Loan |
June 2018.
Over the past twenty years, Europe has deregulated many industries, protected consumer welfare, and created strongly independent regulators. These policies represent a stark departure from historical traditions in continental Europe. How and why did this turnaround happen? We build a political economy model of market regulation and we compare the design of national and supra-national regulators. We show that countries in a single market willingly promote a supranational regulator that enforces free markets beyond the preferences of any individual country. We test and confirm the predictions of the model. European institutions are indeed more independent and enforce competition more strongly than any individual country ever did. Countries with ex-ante weaker institutions benefit more from the delegation of competition policy to the EU level.
Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers
System requirements: Adobe [Acrobat] Reader required for PDF files.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.
Print version record
There are no comments on this title.