Decision Fatigue and Heuristic Analyst Forecasts / David Hirshleifer, Yaron Levi, Ben Lourie, Siew Hong Teoh.
Material type:![Text](/opac-tmpl/lib/famfamfam/BK.png)
- D91 - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
- G02 - Behavioral Finance: Underlying Principles
- G2 - Financial Institutions and Services
- G24 - Investment Banking • Venture Capital • Brokerage • Ratings and Ratings Agencies
- G4 - Behavioral Finance
- G41 - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making in Financial Markets
- Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers
Item type | Home library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Working Paper | Biblioteca Digital | Colección NBER | nber w24293 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not For Loan |
February 2018.
Psychological evidence indicates that decision quality declines after an extensive session of decision-making, a phenomenon known as decision fatigue. We study whether decision fatigue affects analysts' judgments. Analysts cover multiple firms and often issue several forecasts in a single day. We find that forecast accuracy declines over the course of a day as the number of forecasts the analyst has already issued increases. Also consistent with decision fatigue, we find that the more forecasts an analyst issues, the higher the likelihood the analyst resorts to more heuristic decisions by herding more closely with the consensus forecast, by self-herding (i.e., reissuing their own previous outstanding forecasts), and by issuing a rounded forecast. Finally, we find that the stock market understands these effects and discounts for analyst decision fatigue.
Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers
System requirements: Adobe [Acrobat] Reader required for PDF files.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.
Print version record
There are no comments on this title.