Runs versus Lemons: Information Disclosure and Fiscal Capacity / Miguel Faria-e-Castro, Joseba Martinez, Thomas Philippon.
Material type:![Text](/opac-tmpl/lib/famfamfam/BK.png)
- E44 - Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy
- E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit
- E6 - Macroeconomic Policy, Macroeconomic Aspects of Public Finance, and General Outlook
- G01 - Financial Crises
- G21 - Banks • Depository Institutions • Micro Finance Institutions • Mortgages
- G28 - Government Policy and Regulation
- H12 - Crisis Management
- H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue
- Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers
Item type | Home library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Working Paper | Biblioteca Digital | Colección NBER | nber w21201 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not For Loan |
May 2015.
We study the optimal use of disclosure and fiscal backstops during financial crises. Providing information can reduce adverse selection in credit markets, but negative disclosures can also trigger inefficient bank runs. In our model governments are thus forced to choose between runs and lemons. A fiscal backstop mitigates the risk of runs and allows a government to pursue a high disclosure strategy. Our model explains why governments with strong fiscal positions are more likely to run informative stress tests, and, paradoxically, how they can end up spending less than governments that are more fiscally constrained.
Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers
System requirements: Adobe [Acrobat] Reader required for PDF files.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.
Print version record
There are no comments on this title.