Matching Contributions and Savings Outcomes: A Behavioral Economics Perspective / Brigitte C. Madrian.
Material type:![Text](/opac-tmpl/lib/famfamfam/BK.png)
- D14 - Household Saving • Personal Finance
- D91 - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
- G23 - Non-bank Financial Institutions • Financial Instruments • Institutional Investors
- H31 - Household
- J32 - Nonwage Labor Costs and Benefits • Retirement Plans • Private Pensions
- Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers
Item type | Home library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Working Paper | Biblioteca Digital | Colección NBER | nber w18220 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not For Loan |
Collection: Colección NBER Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
July 2012.
Including a matching contribution increases savings plan participation and contributions, although the impact is less significant than the impact of nonfinancial approaches. Conditional on participation, a higher match rate has only a small effect on savings plan contributions. In contrast, the match threshold has a substantial impact, probably because it serves as a natural reference point when individuals are deciding how much to save and may be viewed as advice from the savings program sponsor on how much to save. Other behavioral approaches to changing savings plan outcomes--including automatic enrollment, simplification, planning aids, reminders, and commitment features--potentially have a much greater impact on savings outcomes than do financial incentives, often at a much lower cost.
Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers
System requirements: Adobe [Acrobat] Reader required for PDF files.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.
Print version record
There are no comments on this title.