The Diffusion of Microfinance / Abhijit Banerjee, Arun G. Chandrasekhar, Esther Duflo, Matthew O. Jackson.
Material type:![Text](/opac-tmpl/lib/famfamfam/BK.png)
- D13 - Household Production and Intrahousehold Allocation
- D85 - Network Formation and Analysis: Theory
- G21 - Banks • Depository Institutions • Micro Finance Institutions • Mortgages
- L14 - Transactional Relationships • Contracts and Reputation • Networks
- O12 - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
- O16 - Financial Markets • Saving and Capital Investment • Corporate Finance and Governance
- Z13 - Economic Sociology • Economic Anthropology • Language • Social and Economic Stratification
- Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers
Item type | Home library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Working Paper | Biblioteca Digital | Colección NBER | nber w17743 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not For Loan |
Collection: Colección NBER Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
January 2012.
We examine how participation in a microfinance program diffuses through social networks. We collected detailed demographic and social network data in 43 villages in South India before microfinance was introduced in those villages and then tracked eventual participation. We exploit exogenous variation in the importance (in a network sense) of the people who were first informed about the program, "the injection points". Microfinance participation is higher when the injection points have higher eigenvector centrality. We estimate structural models of diffusion that allow us to (i) determine the relative roles of basic information transmission versus other forms of peer influence, and (ii) distinguish information passing by participants and non-participants. We find that participants are significantly more likely to pass information on to friends and acquaintances than informed non-participants, but that information passing by non-participants is still substantial and significant, accounting for roughly a third of informedness and participation. We also find that, conditioned on being informed, an individual's decision is not significantly affected by the participation of her acquaintances.
Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers
System requirements: Adobe [Acrobat] Reader required for PDF files.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.
Print version record
There are no comments on this title.