The Continental Dollar: Initial Design, Ideal Performance, and the Credibility of Congressional Commitment / Farley Grubb.
Material type:![Text](/opac-tmpl/lib/famfamfam/BK.png)
- E42 - Monetary Systems • Standards • Regimes • Government and the Monetary System • Payment Systems
- E52 - Monetary Policy
- G12 - Asset Pricing • Trading Volume • Bond Interest Rates
- G18 - Government Policy and Regulation
- H11 - Structure, Scope, and Performance of Government
- H56 - National Security and War
- H6 - National Budget, Deficit, and Debt
- H71 - State and Local Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue
- N11 - U.S. • Canada: Pre-1913
- N21 - U.S. • Canada: Pre-1913
- N41 - U.S. • Canada: Pre-1913
- Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers
Item type | Home library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Working Paper | Biblioteca Digital | Colección NBER | nber w17276 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not For Loan |
August 2011.
An alternative history of the Continental dollar is constructed from original sources and tested against evidence on prices and exchange rates. The Continental dollar was a zero-interest bearer bond, not a pure fiat currency. The public was promised redemption at face value in specie at fixed future dates. When time-discounting (rational bond pricing) is separated from depreciation, little depreciation occurred before 1779. In 1779, and again in 1780, Congress passed ex post facto laws altering Continental-dollar maturity dates. Because these new dates were not fiscally feasible, Congress' commitment to the Continental dollar lost credibility. Depreciation and collapse followed shortly thereafter.
Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers
System requirements: Adobe [Acrobat] Reader required for PDF files.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.
Print version record
There are no comments on this title.