Do Security Analysts Speak in Two Tongues? / Ulrike Malmendier, Devin Shanthikumar.
Material type:![Text](/opac-tmpl/lib/famfamfam/BK.png)
- D14 - Household Saving • Personal Finance
- D82 - Asymmetric and Private Information • Mechanism Design
- G12 - Asset Pricing • Trading Volume • Bond Interest Rates
- G14 - Information and Market Efficiency • Event Studies • Insider Trading
- G24 - Investment Banking • Venture Capital • Brokerage • Ratings and Ratings Agencies
- Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers
Item type | Home library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Working Paper | Biblioteca Digital | Colección NBER | nber w13124 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not For Loan |
Collection: Colección NBER Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
May 2007.
Why do security analysts issue overly positive recommendations? We propose a novel approach to distinguish strategic motives (e.g., generating small-investor purchases and pleasing management) from nonstrategic motives (genuine overoptimism). We argue that nonstrategic distorters tend to issue both positive recommendations and optimistic forecasts, while strategic distorters "speak in two tongues," issuing overly positive recommendations but less optimistic forecasts. We show that the incidence of strategic distortion is large and systematically related to proxies for incentive misalignment. Our "two-tongues metric" reveals strategic distortion beyond those indicators and provides a new tool for detecting incentives to distort that are hard to identify otherwise.
Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers
System requirements: Adobe [Acrobat] Reader required for PDF files.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.
Print version record
There are no comments on this title.