Comparative Advantage in Agriculture in Ghana [electronic resource] / James Pickett and E. Shaeeldin
Material type:data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c01d/7c01df19530934ff9c220e9ab611644657929049" alt="Article"
Item type | Home library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Working Paper | Biblioteca Digital | Colección OECD | OECD 802630365008 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not For Loan |
Collection: Colección OECD Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
In 1957, when independence came, Ghana was one of the most advanced economies in sub-Saharan Africa. It seemed well placed to make rapid and substantial progress. In the event, economic performance was dismal, and by 1982 the economy was all but in ruins. External conditions and the weather can carry some of the blame for this. However, the fault lay mostly in internal policy, which, contrary to sound advice given by Arthur Lewis in 1953, discriminated against agriculture and increasingly inhibited market forces. Since 1983 economic reform and recovery have been under way. Here a realistic exchange rate has been central, and market forces have been resurgent. Apart from encouraging the cocoa farmer, policies have not noticeably included agriculture. Stateencouraged agricultural research and development and rural infrastructure could, however, be important, alongside soundly based industrial development ...
There are no comments on this title.