GHG or not GHG [electronic resource]: Accounting for diverse mitigation contributions in the post-2020 climate framework / Christina Hood, Gregory Briner and Marcelo Rocha = GES ou non : comptabiliser les diverses contributions à l'atténuation dans le cadre d'action climatique de l'après 2020 / Christina Hood, Gregory Briner et Marcelo Rocha
Material type:data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c01d/7c01df19530934ff9c220e9ab611644657929049" alt="Article"
- GES ou non comptabiliser les diverses contributions à l'atténuation dans le cadre d'action climatique de l'après 2020
- Q23
- Q56
- Q58
- F53
- Q54
Item type | Home library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Working Paper | Biblioteca Digital | Colección OECD | OECD 5js1qf652kd3-en (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not For Loan |
Collection: Colección OECD Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
It is likely that a diverse range of nationally-determined mitigation contributions will be communicated by Parties under the 2015 climate change agreement. An effective post-2020 accounting framework to understand and track implementation of these mitigation contributions will therefore need to accommodate a range of contribution types and varying national capacities. With Parties now undertaking domestic preparations for developing intended mitigation contributions for the 2015 agreement, three key issues are: (i) what up-front information should be provided alongside intended mitigation contributions to facilitate understanding of the intended contributions and their expected impacts on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions levels; (ii) what accounting rules or guidance for post-2020 mitigation contributions (if any) would it be helpful to agree or develop before 2020, to facilitate understanding of intended contributions and their expected impacts on GHG emissions levels; and (iii) the timing of key decisions on accounting issues, taking into account the agreed timetable for communication of intended mitigation contributions. This paper explores these questions in greater detail and highlights issues that Parties may wish to consider when preparing and communicating their mitigation contributions. Providing Parties with some structure for the framing of intended mitigation contributions could help simplify domestic preparations for these intended contributions, in particular for those Parties with lower institutional capacity.
There are no comments on this title.