Study of public financial management systems for two Asian regional groups [electronic resource]: Comparisons and key features for SAARC and ASEAN regions / Jaideep Kumar Mishra
Material type:data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7c01d/7c01df19530934ff9c220e9ab611644657929049" alt="Article"
- G00
- H60
- H83
- H00
Item type | Home library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Working Paper | Biblioteca Digital | Colección OECD | OECD budget-14-5jrw9czdg326 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not For Loan |
Collection: Colección OECD Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | No cover image available | ||
OECD budget-14-5jrw6591frbw A study on compilation and improvement of indices for legislative budgetary institutions With focus on comparative analysis of current institutions in 60 countries / | OECD budget-14-5jrw6591hj6c Time to look again at accrual budgeting | OECD budget-14-5jrw6591hns1 The whole elephant A proposal for integrating cash, accrual, and sustainability-gap accounts / | OECD budget-14-5jrw9czdg326 Study of public financial management systems for two Asian regional groups Comparisons and key features for SAARC and ASEAN regions / | OECD budget-14-5jxrgssdqnlt Coping with fiscal risk Analysis and practice / | OECD budget-14-5jxrmdxc6sq1 The abuse and misuse of the term "Austerity" Implications for OECD countries | OECD budget-14-5jxst2mfm923 The challenge of budgeting for healthcare programmes |
This paper presents assessments of Public Financial Management (PFM) Systems for two regional Asian groups - the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) and the Association for South East Asian Nations (ASEAN). The study undertaken uses the Public Expenditure and Financial Accountability (PEFA) results for assessment of the performance of PFM systems of countries both within and across the two regions for the six PEFA framework dimensions. This paper also presents results of the study for comparing regional performance with global averages for various PEFA indicators to identify strengths and weaknesses. An in-depth analysis of the PEFA assessments was also done to identify key features and initiatives undertaken by the countries where strengths in PFM system indicators was identified, and recommendations made, for countries moving on the path of PFM reforms for performance improvement.
There are no comments on this title.