Image from Google Jackets

Differential Topology and General Equilibrium with Complete and Incomplete Markets [electronic resource] / by Antonio Villanacci, Laura Carosi, Pierluigi Benevieri, Andrea Battinelli.

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextPublisher: New York, NY : Springer US : Imprint: Springer, 2002Edition: 1st ed. 2002Description: XXXII, 474 p. online resourceContent type:
  • text
Media type:
  • computer
Carrier type:
  • online resource
ISBN:
  • 9781475736199
Subject(s): Additional physical formats: Printed edition:: No title; Printed edition:: No title; Printed edition:: No titleDDC classification:
  • 514
LOC classification:
  • QA611-614.97
Online resources:
Contents:
I -- 1. Prerequisites -- 2. Manifolds in Euclidean Spaces -- 3. Differentials -- 4. Regular Values -- 5. Manifolds with Boundary -- 6. Sard's Theorem and Trans Versality -- 7. Homotopy and Degree Theory -- II -- 8. Exchange Economies -- 9. Production Economies -- 10. Time, Uncertainty and Incomplete Markets -- 11. Numeraire Assets -- 12. Nominal Assets -- 13. Real Assets -- 14. Restricted Participation -- 15. Planner Intervention on the Market Outcome.
In: Springer Nature eBookSummary: General equilibrium In this book we try to cope with the challenging task of reviewing the so called general equilibrium model and of discussing one specific aspect of the approach underlying it, namely, market completeness. With the denomination "general equilibrium" (from now on in short GE) we shall mainly refer to two different things. On one hand, in particular when using the expression "GE approach", we shall refer to a long established methodolog­ ical tradition in building and developing economic models, which includes, as of today, an enormous amount of contributions, ranging in number by several 1 thousands • On the other hand, in particular when using the expression "stan­ dard differentiable GE model", we refer to a very specific version of economic model of exchange and production, to be presented in Chapters 8 and 9, and to be modified in Chapters 10 to 15. Such a version is certainly formulated within the GE approach, but it is generated by making several quite restrictive 2 assumptions • Even to list and review very shortly all the collective work which can be ascribed to the GE approach would be a formidable task for several coauthors in a lifetime perspective. The book instead intends to address just a single issue. Before providing an illustration of its main topic, we feel the obligation to say a word on the controversial character of GE. First of all, we should say that we identify the GE approach as being based 3 on three principles .
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

I -- 1. Prerequisites -- 2. Manifolds in Euclidean Spaces -- 3. Differentials -- 4. Regular Values -- 5. Manifolds with Boundary -- 6. Sard's Theorem and Trans Versality -- 7. Homotopy and Degree Theory -- II -- 8. Exchange Economies -- 9. Production Economies -- 10. Time, Uncertainty and Incomplete Markets -- 11. Numeraire Assets -- 12. Nominal Assets -- 13. Real Assets -- 14. Restricted Participation -- 15. Planner Intervention on the Market Outcome.

General equilibrium In this book we try to cope with the challenging task of reviewing the so called general equilibrium model and of discussing one specific aspect of the approach underlying it, namely, market completeness. With the denomination "general equilibrium" (from now on in short GE) we shall mainly refer to two different things. On one hand, in particular when using the expression "GE approach", we shall refer to a long established methodolog­ ical tradition in building and developing economic models, which includes, as of today, an enormous amount of contributions, ranging in number by several 1 thousands • On the other hand, in particular when using the expression "stan­ dard differentiable GE model", we refer to a very specific version of economic model of exchange and production, to be presented in Chapters 8 and 9, and to be modified in Chapters 10 to 15. Such a version is certainly formulated within the GE approach, but it is generated by making several quite restrictive 2 assumptions • Even to list and review very shortly all the collective work which can be ascribed to the GE approach would be a formidable task for several coauthors in a lifetime perspective. The book instead intends to address just a single issue. Before providing an illustration of its main topic, we feel the obligation to say a word on the controversial character of GE. First of all, we should say that we identify the GE approach as being based 3 on three principles .

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Powered by Koha