Image from Google Jackets

Transfer Pricing and Valuation in Corporate Taxation [electronic resource] : Federal Legislation vs. Administrative Practice / by Elizabeth King.

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextPublisher: Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer, 1994Edition: 1st ed. 1994Description: XVIII, 284 p. online resourceContent type:
  • text
Media type:
  • computer
Carrier type:
  • online resource
ISBN:
  • 9780306482182
Subject(s): Additional physical formats: Printed edition:: No title; Printed edition:: No title; Printed edition:: No titleDDC classification:
  • 343.03
LOC classification:
  • K4430-4675
Online resources:
Contents:
Legislation and Regulations -- Transfer Pricing and Valuation Regulations -- Transfer Pricing and Valuation Regulations in Practive -- The Cost-plus Method -- The Resale Price Method -- Cost-sharing Agreements -- Intra-company Royalty Agreements -- Valuation of Intangible Assets: Section 338 -- Conclusions and Policy Recommendations.
In: Springer Nature eBookSummary: Transfer Pricing and Valuation in Corporate Taxation analyzes the disparities between both federal statutes and regulations, and r- ulations and administrative practice, in a highly controversial area of corporate tax policy: intra-company transfer pricing for tax p- poses. It addresses issues that often mean millions of dollars to in- vidual corporations, and a significant fraction of the federal gove- ment's revenue base. These disparities between law, regulations, and administrative practice are concerning on a number of grounds. First, they - pose considerable economic costs by inducing corporations to engage in a variety of "rent-seeking" activities designed to reduce their - pected tax liabilities, and by requiring the IRS to devote still more to enforcement efforts that are very often futile. Second, they are in- ; herently undemocratic. Administrative practice is currently ad hoc by relying on dispute resolution procedures that can and do yield very different settlements on disputed tax issues from one case to another, the IRS often ends up treating similarly situated cor- rations very differently. Moreover, to the extent that the disp- ity between statute and implementation reflects the IRS's failure to carry out Congress' will, the laws passed by duly elected officials are effectively being superseded by administrative procedure, developed incrementally by individuals who are not answerable to an electorate.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Home library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode Item holds
E-Book E-Book Biblioteca Digital Colección SPRINGER 343.03 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not For Loan
Total holds: 0

Legislation and Regulations -- Transfer Pricing and Valuation Regulations -- Transfer Pricing and Valuation Regulations in Practive -- The Cost-plus Method -- The Resale Price Method -- Cost-sharing Agreements -- Intra-company Royalty Agreements -- Valuation of Intangible Assets: Section 338 -- Conclusions and Policy Recommendations.

Transfer Pricing and Valuation in Corporate Taxation analyzes the disparities between both federal statutes and regulations, and r- ulations and administrative practice, in a highly controversial area of corporate tax policy: intra-company transfer pricing for tax p- poses. It addresses issues that often mean millions of dollars to in- vidual corporations, and a significant fraction of the federal gove- ment's revenue base. These disparities between law, regulations, and administrative practice are concerning on a number of grounds. First, they - pose considerable economic costs by inducing corporations to engage in a variety of "rent-seeking" activities designed to reduce their - pected tax liabilities, and by requiring the IRS to devote still more to enforcement efforts that are very often futile. Second, they are in- ; herently undemocratic. Administrative practice is currently ad hoc by relying on dispute resolution procedures that can and do yield very different settlements on disputed tax issues from one case to another, the IRS often ends up treating similarly situated cor- rations very differently. Moreover, to the extent that the disp- ity between statute and implementation reflects the IRS's failure to carry out Congress' will, the laws passed by duly elected officials are effectively being superseded by administrative procedure, developed incrementally by individuals who are not answerable to an electorate.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Powered by Koha