Image from Google Jackets

Crowding Out Fiscal Stimulus [electronic resource] : Testing the Effectiveness of US Government Stimulus Programs / by John J. Heim.

By: Contributor(s): Material type: TextTextPublisher: Cham : Springer International Publishing : Imprint: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017Edition: 1st ed. 2017Description: XXI, 272 p. 5 illus. in color. online resourceContent type:
  • text
Media type:
  • computer
Carrier type:
  • online resource
ISBN:
  • 9783319459677
Subject(s): Additional physical formats: Printed edition:: No title; Printed edition:: No title; Printed edition:: No titleDDC classification:
  • 336
LOC classification:
  • HJ9-9940
Online resources:
Contents:
1. Introduction -- 2. Theory of Crowd Out -- 3. Literature Review -- 4. Methodology -- 5. Test Results: Consumer Spending and Borrowing Models (1 Variable Deficit) -- 6. Test Results: Investment Spending and Borrowing Models (1 Variable Deficit) -- 7. Test Results: Consumer Spending and Borrowing Models (2 Variable Deficit) -- 8. Test Results: Investment Spending and Borrowing Models (2 Variable Deficit) -- 9. Are Findings of 1 and 2 Variable Consumer and Investment Deficit Models Consistent? -- 10. Effects of Stimulus Programs on GDP, Net of Crowd Out Effects -- 11. Dynamic Effects -- 12. Alternatives to Financing Stimulus Programs with Domestic Borrowing -- 13. A Note on the Disposable Income Variable in the Consumption Models -- 14. Do Crowd Out Effects Differ in Recessions and Nonrecession Periods? -- 15. Does the Gale/Orszag Hypothesis Explain Tax and Spending Effects Better in Recession than Nonrecession Periods? -- 16. Summary of Findings and Conclusions.
In: Springer Nature eBookSummary: This book presents overwhelming evidence that US government stimulus programs over the past fifty years have not worked. Using the best and most modern econometric testing models, it applies 228 separate hard science tests to examine the effects of different stimulus models that should, in theory, have shown positive results. By testing every possible alternative interpretation, starting with one time period and then retesting in three additional time periods, this definitive study finds that even when favoring pro-stimulus Keynesian models, public financing through government tax cuts and spending increase programs is more likely to drive down - or "crowd out" - as much private sector spending as it stimulates in the public sector.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Home library Collection Call number Status Date due Barcode Item holds
E-Book E-Book Biblioteca Digital Colección SPRINGER 336 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) Not For Loan
Total holds: 0

1. Introduction -- 2. Theory of Crowd Out -- 3. Literature Review -- 4. Methodology -- 5. Test Results: Consumer Spending and Borrowing Models (1 Variable Deficit) -- 6. Test Results: Investment Spending and Borrowing Models (1 Variable Deficit) -- 7. Test Results: Consumer Spending and Borrowing Models (2 Variable Deficit) -- 8. Test Results: Investment Spending and Borrowing Models (2 Variable Deficit) -- 9. Are Findings of 1 and 2 Variable Consumer and Investment Deficit Models Consistent? -- 10. Effects of Stimulus Programs on GDP, Net of Crowd Out Effects -- 11. Dynamic Effects -- 12. Alternatives to Financing Stimulus Programs with Domestic Borrowing -- 13. A Note on the Disposable Income Variable in the Consumption Models -- 14. Do Crowd Out Effects Differ in Recessions and Nonrecession Periods? -- 15. Does the Gale/Orszag Hypothesis Explain Tax and Spending Effects Better in Recession than Nonrecession Periods? -- 16. Summary of Findings and Conclusions.

This book presents overwhelming evidence that US government stimulus programs over the past fifty years have not worked. Using the best and most modern econometric testing models, it applies 228 separate hard science tests to examine the effects of different stimulus models that should, in theory, have shown positive results. By testing every possible alternative interpretation, starting with one time period and then retesting in three additional time periods, this definitive study finds that even when favoring pro-stimulus Keynesian models, public financing through government tax cuts and spending increase programs is more likely to drive down - or "crowd out" - as much private sector spending as it stimulates in the public sector.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Powered by Koha