The Impact of Selection into the Labor Force on the Gender Wage Gap / Francine D. Blau, Lawrence M. Kahn, Nikolai Boboshko, Matthew L. Comey.
Material type:![Text](/opac-tmpl/lib/famfamfam/BK.png)
- C21 - Cross-Sectional Models • Spatial Models • Treatment Effect Models • Quantile Regressions
- C24 - Truncated and Censored Models • Switching Regression Models • Threshold Regression Models
- J16 - Economics of Gender • Non-labor Discrimination
- J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs
- J31 - Wage Level and Structure • Wage Differentials
- J71 - Discrimination
- Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers
Item type | Home library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Working Paper | Biblioteca Digital | Colección NBER | nber w28855 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not For Loan |
May 2021.
We study the impact of selection bias on estimates of the gender pay gap, focusing on whether the gender pay gap has fallen since 1981. Previous research has found divergent results across techniques, identification strategies, data sets, and time periods. Using Michigan Panel Study of Income Dynamics data and a number of different identification strategies, we find robust evidence that, after controlling for selection, there were large declines in the raw and the unexplained gender wage gaps over the 1981-2015 period. Under our preferred method of accounting for selection, we find that the raw median wage gap declined by 0.378 log points, while the median unexplained gap declined by a more modest but still substantial 0.204 log points. These declines are larger than estimates that do not account for selection. Our results suggest that women's relative wage offers have increased over this period, even after controlling for their measured covariates, including education and actual labor market experience. However, we note that substantial gender wage gaps remain. In 2015, at the median, the selectivity-corrected gaps were 0.242 log points (raw gap) and 0.206 log points (unexplained gap).
Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers
System requirements: Adobe [Acrobat] Reader required for PDF files.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.
Print version record
There are no comments on this title.