Is Secessionism Mostly About Income or Identity? A Global Analysis of 3,003 Subnational Regions / Klaus Desmet, Ignacio Ortuño-Ortín, Ömer Özak.
Material type:![Text](/opac-tmpl/lib/famfamfam/BK.png)
- General
- General
- International Economic Order and Integration
- International Economic Order and Integration
- National Security • Economic Nationalism
- National Security • Economic Nationalism
- Intergovernmental Relations • Federalism • Secession
- Intergovernmental Relations • Federalism • Secession
- General
- General
- D70
- F02
- F52
- H77
- P00
- Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers
Item type | Home library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Working Paper | Biblioteca Digital | Colección NBER | nber w30428 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not For Loan |
September 2022.
This paper analyzes whether the propensity to secede by subnational regions responds mostly to differences in income per capita or to distinct identities. We explore this question in a quantitative political economy model where people's willingness to finance a public good depends on their income and identity. Using high-resolution economic and linguistic data for the entire globe, we predict the propensity to secede of 3,003 subnational regions in 173 countries. We validate the model-based predictions with data on secessionist movements, state fragility, regional autonomy, and conflict, as well as with an application to the dissolution of the Soviet Union. Counterfactual analysis strongly suggests that identity trumps income in determining a region's propensity to secede. Removing identity differences reduces the average support for secession from 7.5% to 0.6% of the population.
Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers
System requirements: Adobe [Acrobat] Reader required for PDF files.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.
Print version record
There are no comments on this title.