"Zero Cost'' Majority Attacks on Permissionless Blockchains / Joshua S. Gans, Hanna Halaburda.
Material type:![Text](/opac-tmpl/lib/famfamfam/BK.png)
- Monopoly
- Monopoly
- Asymmetric and Private Information • Mechanism Design
- Asymmetric and Private Information • Mechanism Design
- Monetary Systems • Standards • Regimes • Government and the Monetary System • Payment Systems
- Monetary Systems • Standards • Regimes • Government and the Monetary System • Payment Systems
- D42
- D82
- E42
- Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers
Item type | Home library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Working Paper | Biblioteca Digital | Colección NBER | nber w31473 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not For Loan |
Collection: Colección NBER Close shelf browser (Hides shelf browser)
July 2023.
The core premise of permissionless blockchains is their reliable and secure operation without the need to trust any individual agent. At the heart of blockchain consensus mechanisms is an explicit cost (whether work or stake) for participation in the network and the opportunity to add blocks to the blockchain. A key rationale for that cost is to make attacks on the network, which could be theoretically carried out if a majority of nodes were controlled by a single entity, too expensive to be worthwhile. We demonstrate that a majority attacker can successfully attack with a negative cost, which shows that the protocol mechanisms are insufficient to create a secure network, and emphasizes the importance of socially driven mechanisms external to the protocol. At the same time, negative cost enables a new type of majority attack that is more likely to elude external scrutiny.
Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers
System requirements: Adobe [Acrobat] Reader required for PDF files.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.
Print version record
There are no comments on this title.