Solon, Gary. <br/><br/>
What Are We Weighting For? / 
Gary Solon, Steven J. Haider, Jeffrey Wooldridge. 
 - Cambridge, Mass.  National Bureau of Economic Research  2013. 
 - 1 online resource:  illustrations (black and white); 
 - NBER working paper series  no. w18859 .
 - Working Paper Series (National Bureau of Economic Research)  no. w18859. .
<br/><br/> February 2013. 
<br/><br/> The purpose of this paper is to help empirical economists think through when and how to weight the data used in estimation.  We start by distinguishing two purposes of estimation: to estimate population descriptive statistics and to estimate causal effects.  In the former type of research, weighting is called for when it is needed to make the analysis sample representative of the target population.  In the latter type, the weighting issue is more nuanced.  We discuss three distinct potential motives for weighting when estimating causal effects: (1) to achieve precise estimates by correcting for heteroskedasticity, (2) to achieve consistent estimates by correcting for endogenous sampling, and (3) to identify average partial effects in the presence of unmodeled heterogeneity of effects.  In each case, we find that the motive sometimes does not apply in situations where practitioners often assume it does.  We recommend diagnostics for assessing the advisability of weighting, and we suggest methods for appropriate inference. 
<br/><br/>
<br/><br/><br/>System requirements: Adobe [Acrobat] Reader required for PDF files. <br/>Mode of access: World Wide Web.