Shifting Punishment on Minorities: Experimental Evidence of Scapegoating / Michal Bauer, Jana Cahlíková, Julie Chytilová, Gérard Roland, Tomas Zelinsky.
Material type:![Text](/opac-tmpl/lib/famfamfam/BK.png)
- C93 - Field Experiments
- D74 - Conflict • Conflict Resolution • Alliances • Revolutions
- D91 - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
- J15 - Economics of Minorities, Races, Indigenous Peoples, and Immigrants • Non-labor Discrimination
- Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers
Item type | Home library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Working Paper | Biblioteca Digital | Colección NBER | nber w29157 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not For Loan |
August 2021.
This paper provides experimental evidence showing that members of a majority group systematically shift punishment on innocent members of an ethnic minority. We develop a new incentivized task, the Punishing the Scapegoat Game, to measure how injustice affecting a member of one's own group shapes punishment of an unrelated bystander ("a scapegoat"). We manipulate the ethnic identity of the scapegoats and study interactions between the majority group and the Roma minority in Slovakia. We find that when no harm is done, there is no evidence of discrimination against the ethnic minority. In contrast, when a member of one's own group is harmed, the punishment "passed" on innocent individuals more than doubles when they are from the minority, as compared to when they are from the dominant group. These results illuminate how individualized tensions can be transformed into a group conflict, dragging minorities into conflicts in a way that is completely unrelated to their behavior.
Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers
System requirements: Adobe [Acrobat] Reader required for PDF files.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.
Print version record
There are no comments on this title.