The Growth of Nations Revisited: Global Environmental Accounting from 1998 to 2018. / Aniruddh Mohan, Nicholas Z. Muller, Akshay Thyagarajan, Randall V. Martin, Melanie S. Hammer, Aaron van Donkelaar.
Material type:![Text](/opac-tmpl/lib/famfamfam/BK.png)
- E13 - Neoclassical
- Q51 - Valuation of Environmental Effects
- Q53 - Air Pollution • Water Pollution • Noise • Hazardous Waste • Solid Waste • Recycling
- Q54 - Climate • Natural Disasters and Their Management • Global Warming
- Q56 - Environment and Development • Environment and Trade • Sustainability • Environmental Accounts and Accounting • Environmental Equity • Population Growth
- Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers
Item type | Home library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Working Paper | Biblioteca Digital | Colección NBER | nber w27398 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not For Loan |
June 2020.
A persistent issue in environmental economics is whether growth is sustainable. Pollution is a key driver of sustainability, which we define as an economy exhibiting falling pollution damages at its balanced growth path. We deduct air pollution and carbon dioxide damages from the national accounts for 163 countries between 1998 and 2018. Global pollution intensity fell from 1998 to 2008, remaining flat thereafter. China highlights the importance of defining sustainability in terms of damages; between 2011 and 2018, physical measures of environmental quality improved, but monetary damage increased by 50 percent. Sustainability based on emissions ignores this rise in damage.
Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers
System requirements: Adobe [Acrobat] Reader required for PDF files.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.
Print version record
There are no comments on this title.