Quantifying the Social Value of a Universal COVID-19 Vaccine and Incentivizing Its Development / Rachel Glennerster, Thomas Kelly, Claire T. McMahon, Christopher M. Snyder.
Material type:![Text](/opac-tmpl/lib/famfamfam/BK.png)
- Government Expenditures and Health
- Government Expenditures and Health
- Government Policy • Regulation • Public Health
- Government Policy • Regulation • Public Health
- Chemicals • Rubber • Drugs • Biotechnology • Plastics
- Chemicals • Rubber • Drugs • Biotechnology • Plastics
- H51
- I18
- L65
- Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers
Item type | Home library | Collection | Call number | Status | Date due | Barcode | Item holds | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Working Paper | Biblioteca Digital | Colección NBER | nber w32059 (Browse shelf(Opens below)) | Not For Loan |
January 2024.
A booster of the COVID-19 vaccine targeting the prevailing Omicron variant did not become available in the United States until a year after the variant was first detected. This pattern of developing, testing, and distributing a variant-specific booster may become the default response to further waves of COVID-19 caused by new variants. An innovation with realistic scientific potential--a universal COVID-19 vaccine, effective against existing and future variants--could provide much more value by preempting new variants. Averaged across Monte Carlo simulations, we estimate the incremental value to the U.S. population of a universal COVID-19 vaccine to be $1.5-$2.6 trillion greater than variant-specific boosters (depending on how the arrival rate of variants is modeled). This social value eclipses the cost of an advance market commitment to incentivize the universal vaccine by several orders of magnitude.
Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers
System requirements: Adobe [Acrobat] Reader required for PDF files.
Mode of access: World Wide Web.
Print version record
There are no comments on this title.