The Impact of Vertical Integration on Physician Behavior and Healthcare Delivery: Evidence from Gastroenterology Practices / Soroush Saghafian, Lina D. Song, Joseph P. Newhouse, Mary Beth Landrum, John Hsu.

By:

Saghafian, Soroush

Contributor(s):

Material type: Text

TextSeries: Working Paper Series (National Bureau of Economic Research) ; no. w30928.Publication details: Cambridge, Mass. National Bureau of Economic Research 2023.Description: 1 online resource: illustrations (black and white)Subject(s):

Other classification:

Online resources:

Available additional physical forms:

Hardcopy version available to institutional subscribers

Abstract: US healthcare is undergoing a period of substantial change, with many hospitals vertically integrating with physician practices. Such integration could improve quality by promoting care coordination, but could also worsen it by impacting care delivery. Evidence on how physicians alter their behavior from the changes in financial ownership and the incentive structures of the integrated organizations is scant. We examine Medicare patients treated by gastroenterologists, a specialty with a recent increase in vertical integration. Using a causal model and large-scale patient-level national panel data that include 2.6 million patient visits across 5,488 physicians, we examine changes in various measures of care delivery. We find that physicians significantly alter care processes (e.g., in using anesthesia with deep sedation) after they vertically integrate, and that patients' post-procedure complications increase substantially. We provide evidence that the financial incentive structure of the integrated practices is the main reason for the changes in physician behavior, since it discourages the integrated practices from allocating expensive resources to relatively unprofitable procedures. Although integration improves operational efficiency measured by physicians' throughput, it negatively affects quality and overall spending. We note some potential policy levers through which policymakers could mitigate the negative consequences of vertical integration.

Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.

Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)

Holdings
Item type	Home library	Collection	Call number	Status	Date due	Barcode	Item holds
Working Paper	Biblioteca Digital	Colección NBER	nber w30928 (Browse shelf(Opens below))	Not For Loan

Total holds: 0

February 2023.

US healthcare is undergoing a period of substantial change, with many hospitals vertically integrating with physician practices. Such integration could improve quality by promoting care coordination, but could also worsen it by impacting care delivery. Evidence on how physicians alter their behavior from the changes in financial ownership and the incentive structures of the integrated organizations is scant. We examine Medicare patients treated by gastroenterologists, a specialty with a recent increase in vertical integration. Using a causal model and large-scale patient-level national panel data that include 2.6 million patient visits across 5,488 physicians, we examine changes in various measures of care delivery. We find that physicians significantly alter care processes (e.g., in using anesthesia with deep sedation) after they vertically integrate, and that patients' post-procedure complications increase substantially. We provide evidence that the financial incentive structure of the integrated practices is the main reason for the changes in physician behavior, since it discourages the integrated practices from allocating expensive resources to relatively unprofitable procedures. Although integration improves operational efficiency measured by physicians' throughput, it negatively affects quality and overall spending. We note some potential policy levers through which policymakers could mitigate the negative consequences of vertical integration.