000 | 03795cam a22004097 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | w25751 | ||
003 | NBER | ||
005 | 20211020104206.0 | ||
006 | m o d | ||
007 | cr cnu|||||||| | ||
008 | 210910s2019 mau fo 000 0 eng d | ||
100 | 1 |
_aShue, Kelly. _933198 |
|
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aCan the Market Multiply and Divide? Non-Proportional Thinking in Financial Markets / _cKelly Shue, Richard R. Townsend. |
260 |
_aCambridge, Mass. _bNational Bureau of Economic Research _c2019. |
||
300 |
_a1 online resource: _billustrations (black and white); |
||
490 | 1 |
_aNBER working paper series _vno. w25751 |
|
500 | _aApril 2019. | ||
520 | 3 | _aNominal stock prices are arbitrary. Therefore, when evaluating how a piece of news should affect the price of a stock, rational investors should think in percentage rather than dollar terms. However, dollar price changes are ubiquitously reported and discussed. This may both cause and reflect a tendency of investors to think about the impact of news in dollar terms, leading to more extreme return responses to news for lower-priced stocks. We find a number of results consistent with such non-proportional thinking. First, lower-priced stocks have higher total volatility, idiosyncratic volatility, and market betas, after controlling flexibly for size. To identify a causal effect of price, we show that volatility increases sharply following pre-announced stock splits and drops following reverse stock splits. The returns of lower-priced stocks also respond more strongly to firm-specific news events, all else equal. The economic magnitudes are large: a doubling in a stock's nominal price is associated with a 20-30% decline in its volatility, beta, and return response to firm-specific news. These patterns are not exclusive to small, illiquid stocks; they hold even among the largest stocks. Non-proportional thinking can explain a variety of asset pricing anomalies such as long-run and short-run reversals, as well as the negative relation between past returns and volatility (i.e., the leverage effect). Our analysis also shows that the well-documented negative relation between risk (volatility or beta) and size is actually driven by nominal prices rather than fundamentals. | |
530 | _aHardcopy version available to institutional subscribers | ||
538 | _aSystem requirements: Adobe [Acrobat] Reader required for PDF files. | ||
538 | _aMode of access: World Wide Web. | ||
588 | 0 | _aPrint version record | |
690 | 7 |
_aD03 - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles _2Journal of Economic Literature class. |
|
690 | 7 |
_aD9 - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics _2Journal of Economic Literature class. |
|
690 | 7 |
_aD91 - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making _2Journal of Economic Literature class. |
|
690 | 7 |
_aG02 - Behavioral Finance: Underlying Principles _2Journal of Economic Literature class. |
|
690 | 7 |
_aG12 - Asset Pricing • Trading Volume • Bond Interest Rates _2Journal of Economic Literature class. |
|
690 | 7 |
_aG14 - Information and Market Efficiency • Event Studies • Insider Trading _2Journal of Economic Literature class. |
|
690 | 7 |
_aG4 - Behavioral Finance _2Journal of Economic Literature class. |
|
690 | 7 |
_aG41 - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making in Financial Markets _2Journal of Economic Literature class. |
|
700 | 1 | _aTownsend, Richard R. | |
710 | 2 | _aNational Bureau of Economic Research. | |
830 | 0 |
_aWorking Paper Series (National Bureau of Economic Research) _vno. w25751. |
|
856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://www.nber.org/papers/w25751 |
856 |
_yAcceso en lĂnea al DOI _uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w25751 |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cW-PAPER |
||
999 |
_c322371 _d280933 |