000			02089caa a22003258i 4500
001			717846424625
003			FR-PaOEC
005			20210419170012.0
006			a o d i
007			cr || |||m|n||
008			171201s2003 ||| o i|0| 0 eng d
035			_a(FR-PaOEC)
040			_aFR-PaOEC
084			_aG28 _2jelc
084			_aG23 _2jelc
084			_aJ32 _2jelc
084			_aJ26 _2jelc
100	1		_aQueisser, Monika.
245	1	0	_aIndividual Choice in Social Protection _h[electronic resource]: _bThe Case of Swiss Pensions / _cMonika Queisser and Edward Whitehouse
260			_aParis : _bOECD Publishing, _c2003.
300			_a53 p. ; _c21 x 29.7cm.
490	1		_aOECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, _x1815199X ; _vno.11
520	3		_aIn most OECD countries, the structure of the pension system does not give much potential for individual choice. The Swiss pension system is a particularly interesting case in this respect. Switzerland relies heavily on privately-managed, fully-funded pensions, which employers are obliged to provide. The employees have only a very limited range of individual choice within this system and there has been increasing political pressure to give members more control over their benefits. More choice would increase competition among funds, lead to higher returns on investment of pension funds, improve customer services and result in higher member satisfaction due to more tailored benefit packages. This paper examines the choices currently available to members of occupational pension schemes in Switzerland and how they are making use of these options. It goes on to consider which expansions in choice might be desirable and what obstacles may be in the way of such changes. A particular ...
650		4	_aSocial Issues/Migration/Health
651		4	_aSwitzerland
700	1		_aWhitehouse, Edward.
830		0	_aOECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, _x1815199X ; _vno.11.
856	4	0	_aoecd-ilibrary.org _uhttps://s443-doi-org.br.lsproxy.net/10.1787/717846424625
942			_2ddc _cW-PAPER
999			_c359517 _d318079