000 | 01878naa a22003018i 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 3aa63b9a-en | ||
003 | FR-PaOEC | ||
005 | 20210419170514.0 | ||
006 | a o d i | ||
007 | cr || |||a|n|| | ||
008 | 200701s2020 ||| o i|0| 0 eng d | ||
035 | _a(FR-PaOEC) | ||
040 | _aFR-PaOEC | ||
084 |
_aR12 _2jelc |
||
084 |
_aR23 _2jelc |
||
084 |
_aJ31 _2jelc |
||
100 | 1 | _aÖzgüzel, Cem. | |
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aAgglomeration economies in Great Britain _h[electronic resource] / _cCem Özgüzel |
260 |
_aParis : _bOECD Publishing, _c2020. |
||
300 | _a26 p. | ||
490 | 1 |
_aOECD Regional Development Working Papers, _x20737009 ; _vno.2020/04 |
|
520 | 3 | _aThis paper estimates agglomeration economies in Great Britain. The analysis employs a definition of urban areas as functional economic units developed by the OECD in collaboration with the European Union to investigate the size and sources of productivity disparities across urban areas. It uses data from the UK Annual Survey of Hours and Earnings and the UK Labour Force Survey between 2000 and 2018 and a two-step estimation procedure that accounts for bias in the extent of agglomeration economies arising from individual sorting. The results suggest that a 10% increase in employment density of a city in Great Britain, would, on average, increase city productivity by 0.9-1 percent. The analysis also shows the estimated elasticity for employment density remains the same before and after the 2007-08 global financial crisis, not showing any clear structural break between city size and productivity relationship. | |
650 | 4 | _aUrban, Rural and Regional Development | |
651 | 4 | _aUnited Kingdom | |
830 | 0 |
_aOECD Regional Development Working Papers, _x20737009 ; _vno.2020/04. |
|
856 | 4 | 0 |
_aoecd-ilibrary.org _uhttps://s443-doi-org.br.lsproxy.net/10.1787/3aa63b9a-en |
942 |
_2ddc _cW-PAPER |
||
999 |
_c361591 _d320153 |