000 02899caa a22003738i 4500
001 223552487415
003 FR-PaOEC
005 20210419170916.0
006 a o d i
007 cr || |||m|n||
008 171201s2009 ||| o i|0| 0 eng d
035 _a(FR-PaOEC)
040 _aFR-PaOEC
084 _aC72
_2jelc
084 _aC68
_2jelc
084 _aD58
_2jelc
084 _aQ54
_2jelc
100 1 _aBosetti, Valentina.
_930093
245 1 4 _aThe Incentives to Participate in and the Stability of International Climate Coalitions
_h[electronic resource]:
_bA Game-Theoretic Approach Using the WITCH Model /
_cValentina Bosetti ... [et al] = Incitations à participer à des coalitions internationales de lutte contre le changement climatique et stabilité de ces coalitions : Une analyse en théorie des jeux à l'aide du modèle WITCH / Valentina Bosetti ... [et al]
246 3 1 _aIncitations à participer à des coalitions internationales de lutte contre le changement climatique et stabilité de ces coalitions
_bUne analyse en théorie des jeux à l'aide du modèle WITCH
260 _aParis :
_bOECD Publishing,
_c2009.
300 _a73 p. ;
_c21 x 29.7cm.
490 1 _aOECD Economics Department Working Papers,
_x18151973 ;
_vno.702
520 3 _aThis paper uses WITCH, an integrated assessment model with a game-theoretic structure, to explore the prospects for, and the stability of broad coalitions to achieve ambitious climate change mitigation action. Only coalitions including all large emitting regions are found to be technically able to meet a concentration stabilisation target below 550 ppm CO2eq by 2100. Once the free-riding incentives of non-participants are taken into account, only a "grand coalition" including virtually all regions can be successful. This grand coalition is profitable as a whole, implying that all countries can gain from participation provided appropriate transfers are made across them. However, neither the grand coalition nor smaller but still environmentally significant coalitions appear to be stable. This is because the collective welfare surplus from cooperation is not found to be large enough for transfers to offset the free-riding incentives of all countries simultaneously. Some factors omitted from the analysis, which might improve coalition stability, include the co-benefits from mitigation action, the costless removal of fossil fuel subsidies, as well as alternative assumptions regarding countries' bargaining behaviour.
650 4 _aEconomics
700 1 _aCarraro, Carlo.
_97459
700 1 _aDe Cian, Enrica.
700 1 _aDuval, Romain.
700 1 _aMassetti, Emanuele.
700 1 _aTavoni, Massimo.
830 0 _aOECD Economics Department Working Papers,
_x18151973 ;
_vno.702.
856 4 0 _aoecd-ilibrary.org
_uhttps://s443-doi-org.br.lsproxy.net/10.1787/223552487415
942 _2ddc
_cW-PAPER
999 _c363250
_d321812