000			02172caa a22003018i 4500
001			budget-13-5jxx3sx58x9t
003			FR-PaOEC
005			20210419171118.0
006			a o d i
007			cr || |||m|n||
008			171201s2014 ||| o i|0| 0 eng d
035			_a(FR-PaOEC)
040			_aFR-PaOEC
084			_aH55 _2jelc
084			_aH5 _2jelc
100	1		_aWeaver, Kent.
245	1	4	_aThe Swedish pension system after twenty years _h[electronic resource]: _bMid-course corrections and lessons / _cKent Weaver and Alexander Willén
260			_aParis : _bOECD Publishing, _c2014.
300			_a26 p. ; _c21 x 28cm.
520	3		_aElements of the Swedish pension reform enacted in the 1990s have served as a model for reform initiatives in a number of other countries. Sweden's experience suggests that a Notional Defined Contribution (NDC) pension reform can be sustained in a supportive political environment, but it has not been immune to electoral pressures to prevent visible cuts in pension benefits. Moreover, efforts to lengthen working lives have encountered major barriers both in the way that the state pension system is perceived and in the structure of the occupational pension system. Design of Sweden's individual account tier has major successes in lowering administrative costs and in providing information across sources of retirement income, but efforts to increase active engagement in selecting retirement savings portfolios have faltered. Sweden has modified its new pension system in several ways over the past decade to address perceived problems and political concerns, and debates are now arising on a "Pension Reform 2.0" package of more comprehensive changes. JEL classification: H5, H55. Keywords: Pension reform, pension system, income contribution, retirement, stabilising mechanisms.
650		4	_aFinance and Investment
650		4	_aGovernance
651		4	_aSweden
700	1		_aWillén, Alexander.
773	0		_tOECD Journal on Budgeting _gVol. 13, no. 3, p. 1-26 _q13:3<1 _x16812336
856	4	0	_aoecd-ilibrary.org _uhttps://s443-doi-org.br.lsproxy.net/10.1787/budget-13-5jxx3sx58x9t
942			_2ddc _cW-PAPER
999			_c364077 _d322639