000			02009caa a22002658i 4500
001			clp-10-5kmjlgt6ngq4
003			FR-PaOEC
005			20210419171401.0
006			a o d i
007			cr || |||m|n||
008			171201s2010 ||| o i|0| 0 eng d
035			_a(FR-PaOEC)
040			_aFR-PaOEC
110	2		_aOrganisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
245	1	0	_aLand Use Restrictions as Barriers to Entry _h[electronic resource] / _cOrganisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
260			_aParis : _bOECD Publishing, _c2010.
300			_a67 p. ; _c16 x 23cm.
520	3		_aThe OECD Competition Committee debated competitive effects of land use restrictions in February 2008. Land use restrictions often serve valuable social purposes. The benefits of particular policies for land use must be balanced against the costs, though. The social harms that can arise when land use restrictions create "entry barriers" are rarely considered explicitly. Land use restrictions can raise the price and reduce supply of a broad range of real estate and, by preventing new and innovative stores from opening, reduce shopping options available to consumers. More careful integration of policy on land use restrictions with competition policy could benefit consumers and many entrepreneurs and reduce the likelihood that public or private restrictions will lead to supply scarcity. This roundtable examines competition problems affecting commercial construction and use permits, geographic density tests, adverse impact tests, access condition to rights of ay and private restrictions on land use. Steps are identified for improving public policies towards land use restrictions.
650		4	_aGovernance
650		4	_aTaxation
650		4	_aTrade
773	0		_tOECD Journal: Competition Law and Policy _gVol. 10, no. 2, p. 7-73 _q10:2<7 _x16097521
856	4	0	_aoecd-ilibrary.org _uhttps://s443-doi-org.br.lsproxy.net/10.1787/clp-10-5kmjlgt6ngq4
942			_2ddc _cW-PAPER
999			_c365227 _d323789