000 | 03182cam a22005177a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | w30924 | ||
003 | NBER | ||
005 | 20230322103729.0 | ||
006 | m o d | ||
007 | cr cnu|||||||| | ||
008 | 230322s2023 mau fo 000 0 eng d | ||
040 |
_aMaCbNBER _beng _cMaCbNBER |
||
100 | 1 | _aAlston, Eric C. | |
245 | 1 | 0 |
_aNew Institutional Economics and Cliometrics / _cEric C. Alston, Lee J. Alston, Bernardo Mueller. |
260 |
_aCambridge, Mass. _bNational Bureau of Economic Research _c2023. |
||
300 |
_a1 online resource: _billustrations (black and white); |
||
490 | 1 |
_aNBER working paper series _vno. w30924 |
|
500 | _aFebruary 2023. | ||
520 | 3 | _aThe New Institutional Economics (NIE) has its early roots in Cliometrics. Cliometrics began with a focus on using neoclassical theory to develop and test hypotheses in economic history. But empirical consideration of economic and political development within and across countries is limited, absent consideration of the institutional context. The NIE as applied in economic history first focused on the roles of transaction costs and property rights. From this micro-institutional perspective, the NIE expanded its focus to the role of institutions and norms on economic development as well as how economic forces along with political institutional variance influences outcomes both within and across countries. This involves considering both forces that impede and promote economic and political convergence across countries as well the forces that determine a transition to a new economic or political trajectory altogether. Testing for the determinants of economic and political development is plagued with omitted variables and endogeneity concerns, a constraint which has recently prompted scholars to draw on complexity theory to further supplement the NIE and Cliometrics. | |
530 | _aHardcopy version available to institutional subscribers | ||
538 | _aSystem requirements: Adobe [Acrobat] Reader required for PDF files. | ||
538 | _aMode of access: World Wide Web. | ||
588 | 0 | _aPrint version record | |
690 | 7 |
_aHistorical • Institutional • Evolutionary • Modern Monetary Theory _2jelc |
|
650 | 7 |
_aHistorical • Institutional • Evolutionary • Modern Monetary Theory _2jelc |
|
084 |
_aB52 _2jelc |
||
690 | 7 |
_aEconomic Development _2jelc |
|
650 | 7 |
_aEconomic Development _2jelc |
|
084 |
_aF63 _2jelc |
||
690 | 7 |
_aDevelopment of the Discipline: Historiographical; Sources and Methods _2jelc |
|
650 | 7 |
_aDevelopment of the Discipline: Historiographical; Sources and Methods _2jelc |
|
084 |
_aN01 _2jelc |
||
690 | 7 |
_aGeneral _2jelc |
|
650 | 7 |
_aGeneral _2jelc |
|
084 |
_aP0 _2jelc |
||
690 | 7 |
_aGeneral _2jelc |
|
650 | 7 |
_aGeneral _2jelc |
|
084 |
_aP50 _2jelc |
||
700 | 1 |
_aAlston, Lee J. _94809 |
|
700 | 1 | _aMueller, Bernardo. | |
710 | 2 | _aNational Bureau of Economic Research. | |
830 | 0 |
_aWorking Paper Series (National Bureau of Economic Research) _vno. w30924. |
|
856 | 4 | 0 | _uhttps://www.nber.org/papers/w30924 |
856 |
_yAcceso en lĂnea al DOI _uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3386/w30924 |
||
942 |
_2ddc _cW-PAPER |
||
999 |
_c390755 _d349317 |